If the SC isn't fooled by the technology (fwd)

[Jim Choate]

Sure it does Declan, because you don't get the catch doesn't mean it
doesn't exist.

Bottem line if a 'technology' standard is found wanting with respect to
the 4th then extension to the 1st isn't a big jump. If you can't equate
speech-crypto with search-ir oh well.

But you're a journalist so it's not surprising you don't get it, you have
a hard enough time getting quotes correct.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:12:14 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <declan at well.com>
To: Jim Choate <ravage at einstein.ssz.com>
Cc: cypherpunks at einstein.ssz.com, The Club Inferno <hell at einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: CDR: If the SC isn't fooled by the technology

On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 06:22:15PM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> With respect to the current SC deliberation on the use of IR devices and
> unwarranted searches, if they find that the technology is not relevant
> then crypto and many other limitations will fall as well.

This statement makes no sense.

    ____________________________________________________________________

           Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a
           smaller group must first understand it.

                                           "Stranger Suns"
                                           George Zebrowski

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage at ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------