Mr. Wienke, help me out on this -- Re: FW: General Ashcroft m ake his move

[Jonathan Wienke]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't have the magazine in front of me, but if you'd like, I could
scan the page and send you a JPEG or something like that of it. I
don't think the NRA is as good a defender of the Second Amendment as
it could be, and ditto with John Ashcroft, but at least they aren't
trying to totally nuke our freedoms like Clinton, Janet Reno &
Handgun Control Incorporated.

Jonathan Wienke

- -----Original Message-----
From: Richard Stevens [mailto:dial911book at yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:51 AM
To: Jonathan Wienke; freematt at coil.com
Cc: George at Orwellian.Org; cypherpunks at cyberpass.net;
Director at KeepAndBearArms.com; air.man at att.net;
brian at citizensofamerica.org
Subject: Mr. Wienke, help me out on this -- Re: FW: General Ashcroft
make his move


- --- Jonathan Wienke <JonathanW at gbgcorp.com> wrote:
> 
> I get the NRA's American Rifleman magazine. The July
> issue also has
> an article about Ashcroft's letter, which does not
> quote the rather
> lengthy footnote. However, it does contain a legible
> image of BOTH
> pages of the letter, including the ENTIRE text of
> the footnote. This
> is hardly the action of an organization bent on
> distorting Ashcroft's
> view on the Second Amendment. Stupid editing on the
> part of the
> America's First Freedom team, perhaps, but not an
> organization-wide
> conspiracy.
> 
> Jonathan Wienke
> 

Mr. Wienke, 

I paged through the entire July 2001 issue of American
Rifleman, and maybe I'm just blind as the proverbial
bat, but I don't see the article to which you refer
that quotes the entire Ashcroft letter.  On what page
is it?

The July 2001 issue of First Freedom is the one
featuring the Ashcroft letter -- that I have received
thus far.

On the point you raise:  maybe it was merely a bad
editorial decision for the one magazine.  Fine, and we
can forgive that.  But, ask this question:  in what
kind of workplace environment could this kind of
editing decision be made?  

Remember that more than one editor had to approve the
final copy. This is not just a typo.  More than one
person had to consciously decide to omit relevant
material without telling the reader.  

I have to wonder if other sorts of "editing decisions"
that massage the facts and distort the truth are being
made ... and we readers don't know it.  

Maybe it was entirely innocent.  Then NRA should
promptly apologize, correct it and publish the full
text in the following issue.  Let's see if they do.  

- --Richard Stevens

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo!
Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO2YCRxj6oMyeDxZoEQIcBgCfd2QPu23wfwj56en49EF9Aoou6OsAoJdJ
PLKWKsFtG76jnEqK2G6sGBZA
=xyd4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 5373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/attachments/20010730/08598e8d/attachment.txt>