Is minder.net really screwed up?

[Eric Murray]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
> When cyberpass started messing up a few weeks ago,
> I unsubbed there and resubbed at minder.net
> 
> Several times, I've noticed that messages I sent were
> replied to long before I ever saw the original message
> come back. 
> 
> Yesterday I sent a message around 11AM, and just
> got the original back, over 24 hours later.
> 
> I'm used to a delay of an hour or so, but this is
> ridiculous....
> 
> Here are the headers showing the delay taking
> place at minder (I've obscured some local nodes).
> 
> Received: from minder.net-gate.com ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by
> AAAAA.securitydynamics.com
>           via smtpd (for BBBBB.securitydynamics.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) with
> SMTP; 26 Jul 2001 15:22:40 UT
> 
> 4+ hours between pax.m.n and RSA.
> 
> Received: from waste.minder.net (root at waste.minder.net [64.80.76.82])
> 	by pax.minder.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6QBagP81775;
> 	Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
> 	(envelope-from bmm at waste.minder.net)
> 
> 20 hours holdup between waste.m.n and pax.m.n
> 
> Received: (from majordom at localhost)
> 	by waste.minder.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA00895
> 	for cypherpunks-outgoing; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:07:58 -0400
> 
> 
> Anyone else seen this?


The CDRs are busy passing LOTS of copies of Sircam between themselves.
It got so bad that I had to limit the size of incoming mail to lne.

I'm also having problems getting CDR mail into minder.net.  I expect
that they're swamped.


Eric