Killing the G8 Anarchists

[Petro]

At 10:37 AM -0700 7/21/01, Morlock Elloi wrote:
>> Their anti-property rights slogans, their disdain for private property,
>> their embrace of socialist and Marxist ideology? See a nice writeup on this
>> point that Cato's Aaron Lucas sent to my Politech list: 
>
>Cato is the first place that I visit when curious about the current agenda of
>the unique mix of libertarian/new world order propaganda.
>
>Translating protesters' agenda to "anti-property" *is* pure propaganda designed
>to scare god-fearing middle class cypherpunks that somehow they will lose some
>of their property should G8 protesters seize the world government (BTW, it
>would be interesting to see what is the net worth of cpunkers and how that
>influences their positions :-)
>
>As the word "communist" loses its strength new words are needed to instill
>fear, and "anti-property" is a nice catchall. It's all in the language. 
>
>You also enumerate ideologies with implicit assumption that they are "bad". So
>whatever can be labeled "marxist" or "socialist" is somehow horrible. You don't
>say WHAT is bad about it, you *assume* that everyone will jump to the bandwagon
>and agree that it's something bad. Kill the commies. This is a classic
>propaganda technique.

	Wanna bet? 

	Marxist, socialist and communist ideologies are bad because at some level they assume that society has a *right* to the output of my labour above and beyond the level that I consume from society. 

	That is slavery. 

	(To put this another way, it is legitimate for society to force me to pay for what I consume, it has a "right" (tho' this word is meaningless when it comes to an abstraction like "society") to my productive labour *ONLY* to the point where it pays for what I use. Marxist, Socialists, communists, Nazis and Fascists have the further problem of believing (for the most part) in massively centralized planning structures. In societies of about 100k people, these fail miserably, and don't work all that well in smaller groups. 

	

>
>I will not bother citing sources that have exactly the opposite PoV from Cato's
>- you can look them up yourself. The point of a discussion is not spamming each
>other with pre-digested, ready-to-wear, downloaded simplifications but to
>inject some of own experience and induction.
>Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
>http://phonecard.yahoo.com/