Hey Kids: Revere Intellectual Property Rights
George at Orwellian.Org
George at Orwellian.Org
Wed Jul 18 13:35:18 PDT 2001
http://salon.com/tech/feature/2001/07/16/abc_ip/index.html
#
# Why can't Johnny respect copyrights?
#
# In Britain, elementary-school classrooms prepare to preach
# reverence for intellectual property -- and to denounce the
# evils of file-sharing.
#
# - - - - - - - - - - - -
#
# By Alan Docherty
#
# July 16, 2001
#
# If members of the U.K.'s Creative Industries Task Force
# [ http://www.culture.gov.uk/creative/creative_industries.html ]
# have their way, British teenagers will soon be cramming
# for tests on intellectual property law and the legal implications
# of file-sharing. Schoolkids who download illicit MP3 files, cut
# and paste newspaper articles or e-mail them, or exchange JPEG
# files of Britney Spears will learn the error of their ways --
# at least according to the copyright officials.
#
# Classroom indoctrination is one way of targeting the Napster
# demographic. But can it work?
#
# To get a glimpse of this possible future of British elementary
# education, one must wade through a study produced by the task
# force's Intellectual Property Group, which includes represent
# atives from British broadcasting, the music industry, publishers
# and others with an interest in protecting copyrighted material.
# The Report of the Intellectual Property Group of the Creative
# Industries Task Force
# [ http://www.patent.gov.uk/copy/notices/pdf/ipgroup.pdf ]
# recommends, among other things, that copyright be brought into
# the classroom -- not as a separate course, necessarily, but
# integrated into the regular curriculum.
#
# "Copyright is relevant to music, art, information, technology,
# and English; and patents and design rights are relevant to science
# and design technology," reads the report. It goes on to recommend
# specific ways teachers might make copyright issues a little more
# real to their 12- to 18-year-olds: "School children should
# recognize their own creativity by including the copyright symbol
# on their course work."
#
#
# Interest in bringing copyright into the classroom is growing
# among government officials in Britain as well. Chris Smith,
# secretary of state for culture, media and sport, recently said:
# "Intellectual property rights are at the heart of the new
# knowledge economy and are of vital importance to the creative
# industries. Greater recognition by the public of the role and
# importance of intellectual property rights must be encouraged."
#
# Intellectual property is already a part of the British school
# system, but mostly in the higher grades. An "Intellectual Property
# Pack Set," a CD-ROM designed to "Give Students Competitive Edge,"
# [ http://www.prowse.co.uk/O240500.html ]
# is produced by the Patent Office in conjunction with Bournemouth
# University and distributed to students across the country.
# Meanwhile, officials at the Patent Office, which is responsible
# for copyright, patents and trade marks in the U.K., are holding
# regular meetings with officials at the Department for Education
# and Skills to bring intellectual property issues into the
# curriculum at an early age.
#
# So where does copyright fit in to the classroom fare of a British
# 12-year-old? Teaching intellectual property is one of many
# competing areas trying to be part of the "citizenship" subject,
# which will become compulsory in U.K. secondary schools beginning
# in September 2002. This new citizenship program aims to teach
# pupils social and moral responsibility, political literacy, sex
# education and the importance of marriage and family life.
#
# According to the Patent Office's director of copyright, Anthony
# Murphy, a major proponent of the new program, understanding
# intellectual property carries important social value: "By bringing
# awareness of the importance of copyright into our schools,
# tomorrow's consumers can take their place in a community which
# understands, values and respects intellectual property."
#
# But even the program's proponents agree that teenagers may not
# be receptive to a program that teaches them that trading MP3s
# is morally wrong. Anthony Murphy acknowledges that: "The idea
# that counterfeiting and piracy are victimless crimes is an all
# too common perception."
#
# Jessica Litman, professor of law at Wayne State University and
# author of "Digital Copyright," agrees. "Young people, and other
# people, believe in a version of the copyright law that is
# different from the one now on the books. Many of them believe,
# for example, that if you buy a CD, you buy the right to share
# it. "
#
# Some opponents also argue that it may be inappropriate to be
# bringing intellectual property (I.P.) education into the classroom
# when laws surrounding it are so hotly contested. Litman says
# that educating children on the difference between "good" and
# "bad" behavior is tough in a field that's in flux: "Any effort
# to include I.P. in a moral education curriculum has to grapple
# with the fact that the moral choices made in extant versions
# of I.P. law are highly contested."
#
# Finally, if controversy over intellectual property can be managed
# into a school curriculum, will students learn the lesson? As
# with the American DARE program, will educators find that telling
# students what decision to make might actually backfire?
# [ http://salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/02/16/dare/print.html ]
#
# According to James Davison Hunter, professor of sociology and
# religious studies at the University of Virginia and author of
# "The Death of Character," "Moral education programs have little
# or no positive effect upon moral behavior, achievement or anything
# else."
#
# The desire to preach citizenship reflects a deep-rooted anxiety
# about whether young people can grow into law-abiding citizens.
# Copyright educators can only hope that students aren't immune
# to their teachings.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list