Who can tax a satellite?
Tim May
tcmay at got.net
Wed Jul 11 19:13:19 PDT 2001
At 5:58 PM -0700 7/11/01, David Honig wrote:
>At 08:58 AM 7/11/01 -0700, mmotyka at lsil.com wrote:
>>I suppose, as with any racket, whoever has the ability to knock the
>>satellites down or render them inoperable could levy a "tax" on them.
>
>Heh, right on. But some dingleberry in LA is not about to violate an
>international
>space treaty without *really* needing the publicity. The treaty that
>says you don't fight in space. (Yes, I know its toast when next the US
>needs to perform a little orbital cleansing.)
>
>Besides, when multiple gangs see an untaxed (but coercable) resource, they'll
>fight amongst themselves first for the territory.
I'll bet good money that Washington is leaning on L.A. to drop this
ridiculous claim.
For several decades the U.S. (and presumably Russia/FSU) has
convinced the nations of the world that fees need not be paid to
India, Botswana, and Shakedownistan just because U.S. satellites pass
overhead. If L.A. is able to shake down Hughes for some tax to be
distributed to the welfare bums and crack hoes, then Botswana and
Shakedownistan will be next in line.
--Tim May
--
Timothy C. May tcmay at got.net Corralitos, California
Political: Co-founder Cypherpunks/crypto anarchy/Cyphernomicon
Technical: physics/soft errors/Smalltalk/Squeak/agents/games/Go
Personal: b.1951/UCSB/Intel '74-'86/retired/investor/motorcycles/guns
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list