Declan misses the mark on ecash
Declan McCullagh
declan at well.com
Thu Jul 5 12:28:09 PDT 2001
Anonymous comments like the ones I dismissed can be dismissed easily
enough.
I never said the approach was "clearly covered," but I suspect it
is probably covered. If you can point me to authority to the contrary,
I would be delighted to read it. I suspect you can't.
-Declan
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:49:07PM -0400, Adam Back wrote:
> I don't think anyone was claiming you would proceed in any patented
> area without legal advise. I don't think anonymous comments should
> hold less weight. Yet you were presuming to dismiss Wagner's approach
> as clearly covered by patents which appears to be an uninformed and
> probably incorrect opinion.
>
> Adam
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list