Declan misses the mark on ecash

Declan McCullagh declan at well.com
Thu Jul 5 12:28:09 PDT 2001


Anonymous comments like the ones I dismissed can be dismissed easily
enough.

I never said the approach was "clearly covered," but I suspect it
is probably covered. If you can point me to authority to the contrary,
I would be delighted to read it. I suspect you can't.

-Declan


On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:49:07PM -0400, Adam Back wrote:
> I don't think anyone was claiming you would proceed in any patented
> area without legal advise.  I don't think anonymous comments should
> hold less weight.  Yet you were presuming to dismiss Wagner's approach
> as clearly covered by patents which appears to be an uninformed and
> probably incorrect opinion.
> 
> Adam





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list