Microsoft Trial Judge Based His Break-Up "Remedy" On Flawed Theory, Not Facts

[Jim Choate]

On 27 Feb 2001, LUIS VILDOSOLA wrote:

> Your last paragraph is a little too complicated for me Jim,
> I'm interested in what you have to say but please break it
> down for me.

Somebody does something. As a consequence another party is considered to
have contributed to the first persons act, without actually participating
in the act.

So, if the first person is not fully responsible, why is the second
party fully responsible? How do you test this?

If a party whose actions contribute is responsible for the consequences
then isn't the censor themselves, since they take an active role, also
responsible?

Doesn't this put a party in the defence in the role of presecutor and
judge? That seems to be a considerable conflict of interest.

    ____________________________________________________________________

           Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a
           smaller group must first understand it.

                                           "Stranger Suns"
                                           George Zebrowski

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage at ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------