[Re: Microsoft Trial Judge Based His Break-Up "Remedy" On Flawed Theory, Not Facts]

[LUIS VILDOSOLA]

I agree Danny
*******************

Danny Yee <danny at staff.cs.usyd.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> lizard wrote:
> > But if source code is free speech, isn't a judge ordering some code be
> > removed/edited/changed an intrustion on free speech? Isn't saying
> > "Remove Explorer from the core install!" the same as saying "Remove this
> > chapter from this book!"
>  
> Is a judge ordering people to stop making illegal copies of M$ software
> and sharing it with their friends not also an "intrusion into free
> speech"?
> 
> I agree that mandating the relationship between IE and Windows is
> stupid, mind you - it's an ad hoc after the event remedy, where much
> more fundamental ones are called for.
> 
> Danny.
> 


____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1