freedomforum.org: Federal judge quashes subpoena for Kansas bookstore's sales records
Declan McCullagh
declan at well.com
Wed Feb 14 13:18:00 PST 2001
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 06:19:50PM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
> It isn't the store that's being protected. It's the purchaser of the
> book, the reader to wit. To force a person to reveal their reading habits
Same principle. Why should book buyers deserve more privacy than
condom buyers? Your thinking is muddled. I've already stipulated
that civil/criminal discovery is far too broad in the U.S.
> Journalist are scum (like lawyers) they sell their integrity, they deserve
> no protection and actually get none. If you look at the history and
Hahahahahahahaha.
-Declan
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list