Foes of privacy bills in Congress try new approach: Federalism
Declan McCullagh
declan at well.com
Thu Feb 1 07:37:43 PST 2001
Bruce Kobayashi and Larry Ribstein photo:
http://www.mccullagh.org/image/950-19/larry-ribstein-bruce-kobayashi.html
Their paper, A State Recipe for Cookies: State Regulation of Consumer
Marketing Information:
http://www.federalismproject.org/conlaw/ecommerce/cookies.html
*********
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,41511,00.html
Should States Regulate Privacy?
by Declan McCullagh (declan at wired.com)
2:00 a.m. Feb. 1, 2001 PST
ARLINGTON, Virginia -- Larry Ribstein and Bruce Kobayashi are nothing
if not ambitious: They hope to reshape the way Washington thinks about
privacy.
Even though many observers of Capitol Hill assume the new Congress
will approve regulations aimed at Internet firms, the two George Mason
University law professors are betting that legislators can be
persuaded to try a more laissez-faire approach.
Instead of the Senate and the House enacting laws, they argue in a
paper published this week, state legislatures should be making the
decisions. Says Ribstein: "Federal law hasn't turned out to be a
salvation in other areas."
Their efforts are part of a nascent -- although fast-growing -- effort
by conservatives and libertarians to target online privacy laws using
many of the same tools, strategies, and alliances they've used to
battle federal environmental, education, and gun regulations in the
past.
On Tuesday, the American Enterprise Institute's Federalism Project
convened an invitation-only roundtable where Kobayashi and Ribstein
presented their paper to an influential audience that included former
OECD ambassador David Aaron, Yale law professor Roberta Romano,
Michael Quaranta of Experian, and Bill Niskanen, chairman of the Cato
Institute.
AEI's Federalism Project argues that the U.S. national government is
an institution that has usurped powers not delegated to it in the
Constitution -- those powers should rightfully be reserved for states.
One 1995 case is a favorite: U.S. v. Lopez, in which the Supreme Court
overturned a federal gun law by ruling it "exceeds Congress' Commerce
Clause authority."
[...]
Their 43-page paper says: "Federal law would perversely lock in a
single regulatory framework while Internet technology is still rapidly
evolving. State law, by contrast, emerges from 51 laboratories (50
states, plus the District of Columbia) and therefore presents a more
decentralized model that fits the evolving nature of the Internet."
They predict that some states will impose more regulations than others
-- by, for example, trying different approaches to mandating
disclosure of privacy practices.
[...]
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list