Pay per use remailers and remailer reliability tracking.

Ben Xain bxain at redneck.gacracker.org
Wed Dec 19 21:51:01 PST 2001


On 19 Dec 01 Len Sassaman wrote:
>(This isn't exact either. Failure, in this case, is pinpointed at the link
>between two remailers, rather than at a given remailer. If a user queried
>the bank and discovered that, out of a 5 remailer chain, remailers A, B,
>and C redeemed the tokens but D did not, this either means C is cheating,
>C is broken on sending, or D is broken on receiving. Further tests would
>be necessary to determine the exact nature of the failure.)

Hmmm I have an idea about this.  What if remailer C doesn't get to
cash in on his tokens unless delivery to remailer D can be confirmed?
Or maybe there is some other way to cut down on cheating.

Ben Xain
bxain at redneck.gacracker.org





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list