CNN.com on Remailers

[Sunder]

Last I heard, neither MAE East, nor MAE West were ever dragged into
court on co-conspiritor charges just because packets from some German
hacker kid hopped through their Cisco's.

----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---------------------------
 + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :aren't security.  A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :masked killer, but  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often.
--------_sunder_ at _sunder_._net_------- http://www.sunder.net ------------

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Eugene Leitl wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Trei, Peter wrote:
> 
> > If I were a remailer operator, I'm not sure I'd like this. Active
> > cooperation with another remaler operator means that if
> > he/she/it does something illegal, you could be dragged in
> 
> How is this different from the current situation? Is usage of a specific
> mainstream protocol sufficient protection from conspiracy charges? Joe Bob
> Postfixuser is hardly a remailer operator.
> 
> > on 'conspiracy' charges, regardless whether you actually
> > had any knowledge of the the other operators nefarious
> > activities.
> 
> -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org
> 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3