CNN.com on Remailers

[Trei, Peter]

If I were a remailer operator, I'm not sure I'd like this. Active
cooperation with another remaler operator means that if
he/she/it does something illegal, you could be dragged in
on 'conspiracy' charges, regardless whether you actually
had any knowledge of the the other operators nefarious
activities.

Peter Trei

> ----------
> From: 	An Metet[SMTP:anmetet at freedom.gmsociety.org]
> Sent: 	Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:17 PM
> To: 	cypherpunks at lne.com
> Subject: 	RE: CNN.com on Remailers
> 
> > Remailer operators should have permanent encrypted links to one another,
> > with constant (or at least message-uncorrelated) traffic volumes.
> > They can still use latency, message pools, and other features, of
> course.
> > But when it comes time to deliver messages to the next remailer in the
> > list, that should be done with a reliable and direct connection that
> > doesn't have to depend on the vagaries of sendmail, procmail, Microsoft
> > servers or the many other layers that get in the way.  This would both
> > increase the reliability of the remailer network and improve its
> security
> > by hiding inter-remailer traffic.
> 
> Great idea! Cypherpunks write code. Let us know when you have something we
> can look at.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
============================================================================
================
This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and are PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express
prior written permission of the sender.  If 
you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, disclose to any
third party or use the contents, attachments or 
information in any way, Please delete all copies of the e-mail and the
attachment(s), if any and notify the sender. 
Thank You.
============================================================================
================