CNN.com on Remailers

[An Metet]

> Remailer operators should have permanent encrypted links to one another,
> with constant (or at least message-uncorrelated) traffic volumes.
> They can still use latency, message pools, and other features, of course.
> But when it comes time to deliver messages to the next remailer in the
> list, that should be done with a reliable and direct connection that
> doesn't have to depend on the vagaries of sendmail, procmail, Microsoft
> servers or the many other layers that get in the way.  This would both
> increase the reliability of the remailer network and improve its security
> by hiding inter-remailer traffic.

Great idea! Cypherpunks write code. Let us know when you have something we
can look at.