CNN.com on Remailers

Jim Choate ravage at einstein.ssz.com
Wed Dec 12 20:03:01 PST 2001



I can clear her point up for you...

http://einstein.ssz.com/hangar18

On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Faustine wrote:
> 
> > Back to remailers: this might have a boneheadedly obvious answer, but
> > is there a role for non-publicized privately-run remailer networks to
> > serve as a "privacy buffer" before putting messages thorugh the public
> > remailer system?
> >
> > For example, if I had the hardware, software, phone lines, internet
> > connections and time to run multiple autonomous mixmaster remailers
> > out of my basement to route my own messages (and dummy traffic) around
> > before funneling them to a public remailer, would there be any way to
> > keep all-but-the-last box entirely shut off from view? Could you
> > achieve this degree of anonymity from running Reliable? What would it
> > take to keep a private remailer network truly private?
> 
> Perhaps I'm unclear on what you are proposing... but if this is really a
> private system, as soon as the mail exits, it's obvious that it came from
> you, no matter how much you mixed it around in your basement. So what's
> the point?


 --
    ____________________________________________________________________

             Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.

                                             Bumper Sticker

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage at ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list