Speech May Not Be Free, but It's Refundable

[Sunder]

Ok, then I propose to surround your property from any vantage point on
public land, and setup gigantic speakers from which I would recite very
loud speeches in your direction at 3:00am.

As I would be on public land and excercising my freedom of speech, you
couldn't do anything as that would be censorship.  Or are you ready to
submit that "Congress shall make no law ... freedom of expression" only
applies to Congress?


Also, I didn't receive any reply from you on your views of the parable of
the ants and the cricket from your insane CACL thread...


----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---------------------------
 + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :aren't security.  A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :masked killer, but  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often.
--------_sunder_ at _sunder_._net_------- http://www.sunder.net ------------

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Jim Choate wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Sunder wrote:
> 
> > But by preventing me from trespassing you're restricting my freedom of
> > speech!  According to you, that's illegal.
> 
> Not at all. You are still free to speak, just not on my property.
> 
> You have a right to engage in any behaviour until it infringes another.
> You're trespassing infringes my property right. My not allowing you entry
> doesn't effect your freedom of speech (only who is listening, which
> isn't a right).