speech + action

Declan McCullagh declan at well.com
Fri Aug 31 15:54:02 PDT 2001


On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:59:54AM -0700, mmotyka at lsil.com wrote:
> Sure, I mention it because despite its being non-functional and
> unpunishable it seemed to have been brought into the courtroom with the
> purpose of spicing up the case.

Sure. If you commit unacceptable-to-the-gvt *actions* and also spend a
lot of time talking about how government officials should be
assassinated, you may reasonably expect those statements to be used
against you during your trial.

But that is a far cry from your earlier government-has-this-power
position, from which you're now backtracking.

-Declan





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list