The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot
jamesd at echeque.com
jamesd at echeque.com
Thu Aug 30 09:50:26 PDT 2001
--
On 26 Aug 2001, at 10:46, Tim May wrote:
> Anyway, it is not easy to create a public company, a public
> nexus of attack, and then deploy systems which target that
> high-value sweet spot. The real bankers and the regulators
> won't allow such things into the official banking system. (Why
> do people think the banking system will embrace "digital bearer
> bonds" having untraceability features when true bearer bonds
> were eliminated years ago?)
I think the safest convenient path to development is to develop
untraceable cash in the US with restrictions on any large
transfers. Then, once the technology is working, set up a
complete new company in a jurisdiction such as Nauru or Antigua
which allows bearer instruments of large value.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
IfH9fDFYT0gsZzF8W1c6SeYfXhieAuGmfGuJbr3e
4HmU02MVm3Sjt7wzdrSI7p7LHwBjt/+HG3dwDeuYD
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list