Bomb Law Reporter - special edition
David Honig
honig at sprynet.com
Thu Aug 23 18:27:08 PDT 2001
At 02:32 PM 8/23/01 +0200, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>> Testing is key. If you don't measure, you don't know.
>
>Renting time in HF testing facilities is expensive. Do you have
>suggestions for a simple sniffer type of instrument, that detects the
>amplitude of a radiated field? Do FETs pick up HF fine?
I'd get a few freq generators (could be real simple, like a crystal osc), a
bunch
of antennae, and a spectrum analyzer or two. Probably some sheets
of RF adsorbing foam to use as attenuators, and for calibration. And the
ARRL handbooks. A preamp after your antennae would increase sensitivity.
A lot of scanning radios have a signal-strength output which
can be used as a wideband spectrum analyzer. With a WinRadio
(computer-controlled
scanner) you could capture the time-domain waveforms too, which could help
with diagnostics. And then I'd spend some time in the desert, or a
foil-lined bomb shelter or cave, doing my testing.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list