chip fabs gearing up for AES (fwd)

mmotyka at lsil.com mmotyka at lsil.com
Mon Aug 13 17:41:18 PDT 2001


"Doc Evil" <drevil at sidereal.kz> wrote :
>> With subtle distinctions, intellectual-property (IP) core vendors are
>> readying implementations of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
>> security algorithm.
>
>This author needs to get a clue.  There is only one form of
>intellectual property, which is the trademark, and trademarks won't
>benefit from encryption.  Copyrights are "held", not "owned".
>Copyrights expire; property doesn't.  Copyrights exist to reward the
>production of artisitic or literary material, as a public benefit.
>Property rights exist for their owners.
>
>The term "intellectual property" must have been invented by the same
>PR genius who invented the terms "freeway" and "Social Security".
>
It's a matter of context. In the chip world a tested netlist that can be
turned into Si is "IP" in the sense that it is something a company can
offer as a product.

AES is no different from USB, bluetooth, IEEE-1384, SCSI, 802.11b, MPEG,
PCI cores etc. 

Yes, actual work is involved in turning a public standard into Si.

Yes, people actually pay to include this sort of "IP" in their ASICs
along with CPUs, memory, I/O and whatever else they may need to fuel
their cash flow. 

Various licenses may or may not be part of each piece of "IP" used in an
ASIC. Each has to be addressed before the part is built or your lawyers
can fight it out later in court.

I'm more of a SW than a HW guy but this is pretty much the view I've
gotten of the business.

Mike





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list