Products Liability and Innovation. Was: Re: Traceable Infrastructure is as vulnerable as traceable messages.
Jim Choate
ravage at einstein.ssz.com
Mon Aug 13 14:54:14 PDT 2001
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Black Unicorn wrote:
> I think 30+ years of active products liability jurisprudence might disagree
> with you. Just in the automotive world and off the top of my head: Automatic
> Breaking Systems, designed failure points (crumple zones), 6mph bumpers,
> "safety glass," shoulder belts, passive belts, air bags and a host of other
> technologies or innovations that may or may not have been developed "but for"
> litigation are most probably the result of strict liability in products
> liability cases.
Actually almost every one of these examples were DEVELOPED either 'out of
the blue' by the industry or by the 'off-road/racing' groups, not by any
factor related to litigation (though their ACCEPTANCE in the regular
consumer market was - thought those are not the same beaties by a long
shot). Most definitely these were NOT in responce to litigation.
ABS - Road racing cars (ala Le Mans)
Crumple Zones - Indy style racing and aircraft
Safety Glass - invented in the 20's, in responce to accidents not lawyers
Shoulder/passive belts - racing since the turn of the century
Bumpers and air bags being the primary exception in your examples.
--
____________________________________________________________________
natsugusa ya...tsuwamonodomo ga...yume no ato
summer grass...those mighty warriors'...dream-tracks
Matsuo Basho
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage at ssz.com
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list