[spam score 5.00/10.0 -pobox] RE: Spoliation cites

Aimee Farr aimee.farr at pobox.com
Mon Aug 6 22:36:39 PDT 2001


> > jamesd at echeque.com[SMTP:jamesd at echeque.com] wrote:
> >
> > I am unable to reconcile Black Unicorn's recent post, where he denounces
> > almost the entire cypherpunk program as illegal by current
> legal standards
> > and a manifestation of foolish ignorance of the law and
> obstinate refusal
> > to take his wise advice, with the conjecture that Black Unicorn is aware
> > of
> > current recommended best practice in record keeping.
> >
> I've mostly been staying out of this stormy little teacup, but I'll
> concur that BU is overreaching himself. When he starts to claim
> that writing security software to best industry practices - erasing
> sensitive data as soon as it's need has passed, clearing disks
> and buffers, etc - all practices mandated for meeting certain
> government FIPS levels, and widely documented as standard -
> when he claims that writing programs correctly could get me
> in trouble
> - then it's time to downgrade my estimates of his
> knowledge and expertise.
>
> Peter Trei

You guys are acting like Uni said, "THOU SHALT NOT WRITE CODE."

Put down your pungi sticks.

~Aimee





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list