Remailer logs

[jamesd at echeque.com]

    --
On 5 Aug 2001, at 18:32, Black Unicorn wrote:
> Yes, but in two of the cases I cited no such notice was sent or required.
> Moreover, the remailer operator is in a much _worse_ position with respect to
> this issue.  How can he or she know which emails are of potential probative
> value to a court?

If you knew beans from shit, you would know that puts him in a much better 
position on this issue.    No possibility of guilty mind.  He cannot be intentionally 
destroying evidence.

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     b/ClMIY27s2DMQtvnXlpQWZGSjat1cjm/g+dX/zX
     4G0us9N4kZ7YRQGwSQzQC9ktxLx3CBXpuaml6TgmW