Spoliation cites

[Aimee Farr]

Sandy, I so appreciate your attempts to span the gap, here, but I feel like
I am watching you hurt yourself. Repeatedly. To no end.

~Aimee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cypherpunks at lne.com [mailto:owner-cypherpunks at lne.com]On
> Behalf Of Sandy Sandfort
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 12:07 PM
> To: cypherpunks at lne.com
> Subject: RE: Spoliation cites
>
>
> James A. Donald wrote:
>
> > He has presented no such
> > punishment, therefore no such
> > case exists.
> >
> > Therefore remailer operators
> > and the rest of us can in perfect
> > comfort fail to keep logs, we can
> > circulate thought crimes into
> > irrecoverable systems, and so on
> > and so forth.
>
> Apparently, James did not understand the thrust of Aimee's post
> at all.  The
> important thing to understand about legal precedents is that they
> may show a
> TREND in the law.  The common law evolves over time.  To say that no
> precedent DIRECTLY ON POINT exists means that you can operate "in perfect
> comfort" is asinine.  The question is, what will a court say NEXT?
>
>
>  S a n d y