Spoliation cites

[Petro]

At 7:22 PM -0700 8/2/01, Black Unicorn wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-cypherpunks at lne.com [mailto:owner-cypherpunks at lne.com]On
>> Behalf Of Harmon Seaver

>>       As others have stated, if you don't keep logs, or throw away all
>> your reciepts, there's not jack they can do about it.
>
>Uh, no.  And if you had been reading the many, many posts on this point
>you'd see that about every one of the 10-15 cases cited here say exactly the
>opposite of what you claim above.  (I didn't see a legal background on your
>resume either but perhaps you have any cites that I don't know about?)

	I think Seaver meant that if if you don't have the stuff, you don't have the stuff and all the fines and jail time in the world won't produce the stuff, especially if it was never there to begin with. 


>>       Although really, the most serious question everyone should be
>> asking is why the court wants "all" copies.
>
>Asked and answered.

	Was it? I missed it in the other discussions.