Gotti, evidence, case law, remailer practices, civil cases, civilit
jamesd at echeque.com
jamesd at echeque.com
Thu Aug 2 23:36:01 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Gotti, evidence, case law, remailer practices, civil cases, civilit
- Next message: Gotti, evidence, case law, remailer practices, civil cases, civilit
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
--
On 2 Aug 2001, at 20:53, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, An Metet wrote:
>
> >Your complaints about "free research" suggest that you have the sense
> >that you are more valuable than or superior to other contributors.
>
> He is not "superior" in any substantial way; however, his expertise
> in law, combined with a willingness to actually discuss it, are in
> short supply here.
He is a nym. We do not know his actual qualifications. From what he has posted here, I am not impressed.
Perhaps he has expertise in some areas of laws. He lacks expertise on the topics that he has posted on.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
OMtuw8KyojUVkoSLXcaUr9jcdfS6Ex5qFnDM4AZa
4Wun79YkjX1Ca45FgxaO60zY96XH18ZqFCQKa3xH2
- Previous message: Gotti, evidence, case law, remailer practices, civil cases, civilit
- Next message: Gotti, evidence, case law, remailer practices, civil cases, civilit
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list