Spoliation cites

[jamesd at echeque.com]

On 2     --
On 2 Aug 2001, at 19:01, Aimee Farr wrote:
[...]
 (under '  1503, documents destroyed do not have to
> be under subpoena; it is sufficient if the defendant is aware that the grand
> jury will likely seek the documents in its investigation);

\All these citations obviously refer to situations where the case is 
already under way, and are thus irrelevant to the claims made by 
Black Unicorn.

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     kd0oj5fW/o0EwOuuRzu0rlgeZRTBEVnHnrOlq6Ym
     4GYnFP1LaTnH+jnHwsBZ1Ad41opi6PXN0S+xhyaK8