CDR: Re: free speech children michigan law
Tim May
tcmay at got.net
Tue Sep 26 23:57:04 PDT 2000
At 8:37 PM -0400 9/26/00, Steve Furlong wrote:
>"A. Melon" wrote:
>> Michigans Anti-Cussing Law Called Into Question
>
><<A Michigan boor swore at and made sexually suggestive gestures to a
>woman after she asked him not to swear near a small child. He might be
>charged under MI's anti-swearing law or under disturbing the peace.>>
>
>This doesn't sound like the peace and safety of the community is being
>threatened. Why doesn't the offended woman file a civil claim, if she
>was that offended? I don't know Michigan law, but the offence should fit
>within the common law "intentional infliction of mental distress" and
>"nuisance" torts.
>
>(I can't believe I wrote that. Two weeks in law school and I'm already
>warped.)
Yep, you've already reached the point of being a waste of skin.
Perhaps you'll be leading the prosecution of a thought criminal in
court when your particular building is mcveighed.
"File a civil claim," indeed. You should be shot dead.
--Tim May
--
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES: 831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list