CDR: free speech children michigan law
A. Melon
juicy at melontraffickers.com
Tue Sep 26 17:05:21 PDT 2000
Michigans Anti-Cussing Law
Called Into Question
Critics Challenge Statutes Constitutionality
Sept. 26, 2000
By Richard Zitrin
PONTIAC, Mich. (APBnews.com) -- A
cussing construction worker may not be
charged with violating the states
controversial anti-swearing law because
of questions about the laws
constitutionality, a county prosecutor said
today.
Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney
David Gorcyca is awaiting a sheriffs
report before deciding what charge, if
any, to file against the construction
worker who allegedly swore at and made
a sexually suggestive gesture to a woman
at a gas station on Sept. 14.
The woman asked the man, who
apparently was upset that a piece of
construction equipment had broken down on the road in front of the
gas station, to stop swearing because there was a woman with a
small child in a car at one of the gas pumps, sheriffs Capt. Mike
McCabe said.
103-year-old law
The construction worker allegedly swore at the woman and told her
he could do whatever he wanted to do because this is America, he
said. The man then grabbed his crotch and made a sexually
suggestive gesture, McCabe said.
The woman called the sheriffs department, which is expected to
present its report to the prosecutor Wednesday.
Gorcyca said prosecutors are waiting to review the sheriffs report to
decide what they may charge the man with, although they likely will
not charge him with using indecent language while the state Court of
Appeals is considering a challenge to the laws constitutionality.
Michigans 103-year-old anti-cussing law has drawn national
attention because of the case of the cussing canoeist, Timothy
Boomer, who was convicted last year of swearing in front of children
after he fell out of a boat in Arenac County.
Boomer was fined $75 and ordered to work four days in a child-care
program, but he has appealed the conviction on free speech
grounds and the case is before the state Court of Appeals.
Uncertainty over statute
The uncertainty over the anti-cussing laws future means Oakland
County prosecutors instead may charge the construction worker with
disorderly conduct, Gorcyca said.
"The Court of Appeals might determine that the statute runs afoul of
the Constitution and they might overturn the statute and set aside
his conviction," Gorcyca told APBnews.com today. "So were kind of
on tenuous grounds, even if we wanted to pursue that charge."
McCabe said Boomers case is not similar to that of the allegedly
cussing construction worker.
"Its a little different than the cussing canoeist, who didnt know
anybody was nearby," he said. "This guy did what he did cognizant
of his surroundings."
Law carries 90-day jail term
A 20-year-old man in Clare County in central Michigan also is
challenging the anti-cussing law.
Steven Clevenger was accused of using indecent language in
February after he was fired as assistant girls volleyball coach at a
high school, Clare County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Jamie
Raymond said.
Clevengers trial has been put on hold while the canoeists case is
before the Court of Appeals. Both men are represented by William
Street of Saginaw, Raymond said.
Neither Street nor officials of the Michigan American Civil Liberties
Union could be reached for comment today.
Raymond said indecent language, which is punishable by up to 90
days in jail and a $100 fine, often is filed in Clare and surrounding
counties.
"Many people have been charged and convicted," she said. "Its not
as common as drunk-driving cases, but its used from time to time in
our county...Usually, people plead guilty, get a fine, thats it. But this
is the first time to the best of my knowledge that the laws been
challenged as unconstitutional."
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list