CDR: Re: would it be so much to ask..

[Reese]

At 08:31 AM 23/09/00 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
 >On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Reese wrote:
 >> At 07:18 AM 22/09/00 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
 >>>On 21 Sep 2000, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
 >>>
 >>>> Considering the current situation, and the contant referrals to it as
 >>>> Capitalism, I wonder how useful this definition really is.
 >>>
 >>>Who refers to capitalism as socialism? If they equate these two polar
 >>>concepts then this indicates the speaker doesn't have a clue.
 >>
 >> Learn to read.  Craig Brozefsky MayOrMayNot be full of it, but you've just
 >> castigated him for something he _did not_ say.  Sometimes, I wonder
 >> why I bother.
 >
 >Take your own advice stupid.
 >
 >What part of 'referals to it as Capitalism', where 'it' is communism do
 >you not understand?

Haaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaahaaa!!!!!!!

Craig said, the current situation is referred to as capitalism.
You asked, who refers to capitalism as socialism?

No one, they refer to it as capitalism, except it isn't really,
was what Craig said.

I pointed out, you munged what Craig had said.

Your reply, something about "it" being communism, is complete hogwash, 
since the original post was about the current system being _called_ 
capitalism, and your mistaken reply, "who calls capitalism socialism?"

I'll retract my earlier admonition:  You don't need to learn to read, you 
need to learn to comprehend what you read.