CDR: Re: would it be so much to ask..

[petro]

>At 10:24 09/19/2000 -0500, Anonymous Coward vomited:
>
>
>>        Hey, Retardo -- when did you ever check? If you had, you'd know
>>that you can't reply to anon remailers. Try replying to this, you clueless
>>shit. Now shut the fuck up about this bullshit, we're all tired of the
>>subject, and if you can't be bothered to check the archives, get the fuck
>>off the list.
>
>Actually asshole, there are plenty of anonymous remailers that DO 
>let you reply to the originator.  In case you're just a bit wet 
>behind the ears yet and hadn't

	No, there are not.

	If it allows *ANY* back trace, it's not anonymous.

>  heard, a while back there was a big problem with one of them when 
>the government ordered them to release their database mapping the 
>pseudonyms back to the originators.
>
>Clueless?  Far from it.

	No, not far. What you are refereing to are "pseudonymous" remailers.

>
>How about this.. you shut your own ignorant ass before you make a 
>bigger fool of yourself than you already have, and try and fucking 
>consider for one second how you manage to sort through a hundred 
>fucking spam messages a day sent to this list, and yet you 
>apparently don't have the mental facility to delete my own messages 
>if you find them so useless.  It's pretty simple for you to add me 
>to the killfile, why don't you do it?  I could personally give a 
>shit if you never read anything more I have to say.  Have fun 
>filtering the spam.

	I think this should stand on it's own don't you?
-- 
A quote from Petro's Archives:   **********************************************
Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government 
of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? 
Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let 
history answer this question. -- Thomas Jefferson, 1st Inaugural