CDR: Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial?

[David Honig]

At 05:14 PM 9/13/00 -0400, Tim May wrote:
>At 4:57 PM -0400 9/13/00, Omri Schwarz wrote:
>>
>>Actually, she got shot at and roughed up
>>by AN members. (AN has a habit of disavowing relations
>>with members once they get in trouble with The Elders of Zion.)
>
>This woman and her daughter just "happened" to be far from home, out 
>near the AN compound, and their car, they claim, just "happened" to 
>backfire.
>
>I doubt the backfiring theory very much...none of my cars has _ever_ 
>backfired, and I've been driving since 1968. I would bet a lot of 
>money that this woman, a leftie simp-wimp, took a shot at the 
>compound she hated so much.

Your internal combustion experience is of little relevence here.

The law is wrong for pinning a rabid security force's wrongs on their
employer.
That is simple deep-pocket mining like the tobacco suits.  

However, Tim is being unjustifiably condemning of citizens with old cars,
methinks.  Even having
an agenda to provoke the brownshirts by slowly driving by does not justify
violence.  Again,
violence is the responsibility of the perpetrators, not their bosses, or
the authors of words
they read.  

Frankly, thinking critically, the backfire defence sounds like
straw-grasping, esp.
given no firearms found on the victims.  One hopes that TM does not
discharge his artillery
towards misfiring vehicles passing his terrain on public roads.

Again: its wrong to bust the smalldicked neonazis for the actions of their
'security force',
its wrong of them to assault passers-by for impulsive noises.



.....
19. Never try to baptize a cat