CDR: Re: Good work by FBI and SEC on Emulex fraud case

Bill Stewart bill.stewart at pobox.com
Wed Sep 6 11:44:35 PDT 2000


>At 1:12 PM -0700 8/31/00, Eric Murray wrote:
>>A small note: IW digitally-signing the releases would not
>>have made a difference in this case--  the guy used his knowledge
>>of IW's procedures to social-engineer IW into accepting the
>>fake release without doing their usual checking procedures.

At 01:22 PM 8/31/00 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>The system I envision would mean each chunk of text ("press release") 
>would carry a digital sig, which could be checked multiple times. 
>Hard for social engineering to get past the fact that Emulex, say, 
>had not digitally signed their own alleged press release.

How often do people check signatures?  
If they check them, and they pass, how often do they check keys?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list