CDR: RE: Parties

Declan McCullagh declan at well.com
Mon Oct 30 07:10:11 PST 2000


At 09:04 10/30/2000 -0600, Carskadden, Rush wrote:
>where he actually says this himself). Under no circumstances do I consider 
>it wise to fly in the face of checks and balances when your cause is 
>"right" but you do not have the majority power. There is a reason that 
>Congress makes laws, just as there is a reason that the Presidents can 
>veto, as there is a reason that the Judicial system interprets the law. 
>It's designed to create a balance that protects us from a loose cannon 
>government going off and acting recklessly.

Ah, but they already have. Your beloved "checks and balances" don't work.

-Declan





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list