CDR: Re: Re: why should it be trusted?

petro petro at bounty.org
Tue Oct 24 00:04:20 PDT 2000


>>  From: petro <petro at bounty.org>
>
>>  > The point is that you are *forcing* me to part with my
>>  > productive labor to support someone else.
>>  >
>>  > This makes me unhappy. Under your beliefs, you can't do this,
>>  > as I have a right to be happy.
>
>No dipshit, you have a right to TRY TO BE HAPPY.

	You're the "dipshit" that can't track a conversation.

	If you could, you would have noticed that it wasn't *me* that 
was making the assertion that one has a right to "be happy", I was 
poking at the original poster for his asserting that happiness is an 
entitlement.


>Typical anarcho/libertarian bullshit misprepresentation. And another prime
>example of 'freedom for me, but not for thee'.
>
>This is a perfect example of the failure of libertarian/anarcho thought,
>it is completely focused on the 'me'.
>
>When will you learn that free market economics is about the market and its
>stability and not the individuals attainment of nirvana. I'll answer my
>own question, never.

	This would have a lot more weight if you could follow a converstation.
-- 
A quote from Petro's Archives:
**********************************************
"We forbid any course that says we restrict free speech."
--Dr. Kathleen Dixon,
Director of Women s Studies,
Bowling Green State University





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list