CDR: Re: Niiice kitty....
James A.. Donald
jamesd at echeque.com
Sat Oct 7 16:24:31 PDT 2000
--
At 02:12 PM 10/7/2000 -0400, Tim May wrote:
> As for Chomsky, I've been deleting all of the recent posts arguing
> pro- or con-Chomsky.
You did not miss much.
In the most recent Chomsky thread, all the same things were said, as have
been said so many times before. Indeed, I have traced the canonical
Chomsky thread back to 1967.
The canonical thread goes as follows:
Chomsky critic: "Chomsky distorts and misrepresents the sources he cites,
and attributes arguments, evidence, and statements to people that they did
not make.
Do
{
Chomsky defender: "No he does not. Produce examples. No one has ever
given any examples of Chomsky doing such a thing."
Chomsky critic produces his favorite examples again.
} while (patience remains);
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
BAnB6UM20wXOg3nqf2/f5M+g0eEq+ETNu3QkxQDR
48hVyE3jP0JHqB9vRs1ecJRcj6KWCgU/wxEAQHdzU
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list