CDR: Re: stego for the censored

[Reese]

At 01:03 PM 06/10/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote:
 >Reese wrote:
 >>  >MP3 ?
 >>
 >> Lossy compression.
 >>
 >> balance snipped, we need lossless compression, eh?
 >
 >nope we don't. remember that everyone said that .jpeg couldn't be used
 >for stego for that same reason? then the first .jpeg-stego tools
 >arrived.

hmmm.  Introduce the stego, after the .mp3 conversion has been performed,
so that new data is introduced to the new .mp3, same as was done with
the .jpg files.

ok, we are parsing at the same bit rate, I read you loud and clear on
this,,,

Reese