CDR: Re: Niiice kitty....

[Reese]

At 12:45 AM 06/10/00 -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
 >     --
 >At 09:02 PM 05/10/00 -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
 > > > Big deal.  Chomsky tells the reader that somewhere there is some
 > > > underreported evidence that the reports of Khmer Rouge massacres
 > > > were fake,
 >
 >
 >Reese wrote:
 > > WHERE?  WHERE DOES HE SAY THIS?
 > >
 > > Exact source with quote, or shaddup.
 >
 >I have given you the exact source with quote a dozen times,

Liar.

 >and each time you simply lie about my words.
 >
 >Here it is, yet again:

The below, is more like it.

 >Distortions at Fourth Hand
 >Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman
 >The Nation, June 25, 1977
 >
 >: : 	such journals as the Far Eastern Economic Review , the
 >: : 	London Economist , the Melbourne Journal of Politics , and
 >: : 	others elsewhere, have provided analyses by highly
 >: : 	qualified specialists who have studied the full range of
 >: : 	evidence available, and who concluded that executions have
 >: : 	numbered at most in the thousands; that these were
 >: : 	localized in areas of limited Khmer Rouge influence and
 >: : 	unusual peasant discontent, where brutal revenge killings
 >: : 	were aggravated by the threat of starvation resulting from
 >: : 	the American destruction and killing. These reports also
 >: : 	emphasize both the extraordinary brutality on both sides
 >: : 	during the civil war (provoked by the American attack) and
 >: : 	repeated discoveries that massacre reports were false
 >

Now I have something to work with, I'll get back to you on this.

 >So tell us, where were these discoveries that the massacre reports were
 >false?  Who discovered them to be false, and how?
 >
 >Nothing that Chomsky and Herman claim in the above is true, but the most
 >important claim, and the most straightforward lie, is "repeated discoveries
 >that the massacre reports were false."

You inserted a "the" again.  In quotes, that's a no-no, so slap the back
of your hand for me.

Reese