CDR: RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk

R. A. Hettinga rah at shipwright.com
Tue Oct 3 13:02:49 PDT 2000


At 10:48 AM -0400 on 10/3/00, Trei, Peter wrote:


> The only bad point:
>
> * All recipients need to have key pairs. Thus, a crypto-only remailer
> can't be a terminal remailer to mailing lists, newsgroups, or
> individuals without keypairs.

Not a problem, one would think. Just need to have a key-pair for a
list-server or mail-to-news-gateway. If it gets onerous, each mail or
newsgroup on the server can have its own keypair as well.

RSA signatures are public domain now, right? :-).

Cheers,
RAH
-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list