CDR: RE: The cause of uncertainty in the election outcome.

Ernest Hua ernest at luminousnetworks.com
Mon Nov 20 01:44:33 PST 2000


Well, that's not entirely true either.  The judicial system is
generally pragmatic, in the sense that they do not address
issues not brought before the court.  For instance, if someone
commits a crime, a prosecutor must bring up charges.  Yes,
this concept seems rather obvious and trivial, but what it
means is that it is very easy for the body of laws which
affect any particular situation (e.g. Presidential election)
to become contradictory and for the accepted practice to
deviate significantly from what the law strictly allows.  It's
not necessarily a bad thing that the system works this way,
but it's definitely a side effect, and most people don't want
to fix what ain't broke.  Clearly, the Florida situation
demonstrates that something is likely broken.

Ern

-----Original Message-----
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: James A. Donald [mailto:jamesd at echeque.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 11:24 AM
To: cypherpunks at cyberpass.net
Subject: The cause of uncertainty in the election outcome.



Because the vote is so close, the outcome depends entirely on a multitude 
of judgment calls about which votes count, and which are counted, and how 
they shall be counted.

The normal procedure in England and the democracies descended from England, 
or imposed by English troops, is that the major parties reach agreement 
before and during the vote count, on how the votes shall be counted.  In 
the US however, you have a multitude of laws, laws which contradicted each 
other, and contradicted actual practice.  For example a lot of perfectly 
good absentee ballots that were presented by the military in accord with 
the usual military practice were rejected this time because they did not 
comply with the letter of the law, even though they complied with custom 
and practice.

The cause of the uncertainty is judicial imperialism.

It is often said that Americans are litigious,but the cause of this 
destructive litigation is judicial willingness to unpredictably overturn 
existing practice.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3246 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/attachments/20001120/8e621334/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list