CDR: Re: A secure voting protocol

[Declan McCullagh]

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:08:01AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
> A "vote at home" protocol is vulnerable to all sorts of mischief that 
> has nothing to do with hackers intercepting the vote, blah blah.

Righto. Absentee ballots require a witness, usually an officer (if
you're in the military) or a notary-type, to reduct in par tthe
intimidation problem.

-Declan