CDR: RE: Reporting weirdness: Hagelin vs. Browne

[Trei, Peter]

> ----------
> From:
> obfuscation at beta.freedom.net[SMTP:obfuscation at beta.freedom.net]
> Reply To: 	obfuscation at beta.freedom.net
> Sent: 	Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:43 PM
> To: 	cypherpunks at algebra.com
> Subject: 	Re: Reporting weirdness: Hagelin vs. Browne
> 
> TCMay writes:
> > On CNN I watched the election results coming in. They always listed 
> > four candidates: Bush, Gore, Nader, and Hagelin. The usual format was 
> > Bush/Gore on the "crawl" at the bottom of the screen and then a 
> > second page with the crawl having Nader/Hagelin.
> 
> In fact, Browne did better than Buchanan in Florida, and for that
> matter Phillips did better than Hagelin.  I too noticed CNN's bizarre
> focus on Hagelin over the much higher polling Browne and Phillips.
> Perhaps Hagelin acquired an aura of respectability at their editorial
> desk due to his fight with Buchanan for the Reform nomination.
> 
> Buchanan beat Browne nationwide but Browne won in a number of states,
> including Florida.  However Browne's vote total ended up being lower
> than in 1996.
> 
> Ob
> 
Watching in Massachusetts, I was actually rather impressed at the level
which the major media were reporting the minor candidates. Unlike previous
years, where it sometimes took days for me to find out how Libertarian
candidates did, this year they were reported live along with the others.

In Ma, Carla Howell got about 12% in her Senate run, just a little behind
the
Republican candidate (the rest went to Kennedy). In fact, Libertarian 
candidates where getting 10-15% of the vote quite consistantly in local
races.

Peter Trei