CDR: Re: [Correction] More blather from the DEMS on FL

Tim May tcmay at got.net
Wed Nov 8 08:14:45 PST 2000


At 10:50 AM -0500 11/8/00, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>
>
>IMHO if the courts order a new election in this county then they need to
>do it for the entire state as the electorial college is winner take all
>and it would be unjust to allow this one county to determine how these
>delegates vote.
>

Well, they spent $3 billion on this election, I hear.

A new vote in this county would let them spend another billion or 
two, just for that one county.

You are right that if they order a new election in that county--which 
is not beyond the pale, as the judges are pols--they should order a 
new election in the entire state. And even that would not be "fair," 
of course.

This may actually be the event which accelerates a move to electronic 
voting. Which is not an unmitigated good, despite the high "Wired" 
score it would undoubtedly garner.


--Tim May
-- 
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon"             | black markets, collapse of governments.






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list