CDR: Re: [Correction] More blather from the DEMS on FL
Tim May
tcmay at got.net
Wed Nov 8 08:14:45 PST 2000
At 10:50 AM -0500 11/8/00, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>
>
>IMHO if the courts order a new election in this county then they need to
>do it for the entire state as the electorial college is winner take all
>and it would be unjust to allow this one county to determine how these
>delegates vote.
>
Well, they spent $3 billion on this election, I hear.
A new vote in this county would let them spend another billion or
two, just for that one county.
You are right that if they order a new election in that county--which
is not beyond the pale, as the judges are pols--they should order a
new election in the entire state. And even that would not be "fair,"
of course.
This may actually be the event which accelerates a move to electronic
voting. Which is not an unmitigated good, despite the high "Wired"
score it would undoubtedly garner.
--Tim May
--
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES: 831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list