The Cost of Natural Gas [was Re: The Cost of California Liberalism]
Mac Norton
mnorton at cavern.uark.edu
Mon Dec 18 16:58:53 PST 2000
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000 auto58194 at hushmail.com wrote:
>
> Huh? Let's make this simple. How is California's lack of power plants
> causing natural gas prices to rise? Plants that don't exist don't use gas
> and don't contribute to shortages.
What the fella said was the lack of power plants indicates a lack of
long-term, fixed price gas contracts, which he assumes, without evidence,
would be inplace had said power plants been built. it's not an unsafe
assumption, btw, but can't be proved.
>
> California's importing power from elsewhere, so why didn't these other generators
> commit to natural gas suppliers?
>
Perhaps because they don't burn gas at their stations. Duh.
> Hint: transmission losses aren't a recent discovery.
No shit. That's why line loss is taken into account in prices.
So, er, what?
>
> Either you're confused or you're trying to use the cold winter as an excuse
> to create a strawman for your anti-Californian views.
>
There are other possibilities. I certainly don't see any strawmwn here,
anti-Cal or otherwise.
> Tim, Jim and Bill have already given good responses to the economic side
> of things, so I won't comment further in that vein.
>
What those guys know about economics you can put into a byte. Get
real or read some econ.
MacN
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list