Carskadden, Rush carskar at netsolve.net
Mon Dec 11 11:06:27 PST 2000


     An even simpler answer is that, for the most part, biometric devices
look cool and get investors and potential customers all moist, but really
aren't very good security solutions at all. But yes, I have implemented or
seen implemented a few different biometric devices that verify animation of
the identifying anatomy. However, as I'm sure you can imagine, that doesn't
really make things any better. And after standing in a chilly mantrap for a
while with one needle in your arm, another in your hand, and a band around
your wrist, you start to think that passwords are pretty neat technology.


-----Original Message-----
From: R. A. Hettinga [mailto:rah at shipwright.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 9:10 AM
To: Jonathan Wienke; cypherpunks at cyberpass.net
Subject: RE:



At 3:00 AM -0800 on 12/9/00, Jonathan Wienke wrote:


> Hasn't any seen the movie 6th Day? Who needs a password when you can
borrow
> the necessary biometric token from its owner if you have a hatchet or
decent
> knife?

The simple answer is that most decent fingerprint readers require a living
thumb, either through simple body-heat or, if I remember correctly,
bioelectrical measurement.

Cheers,
RAH
-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2557 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/attachments/20001211/bbba84f2/attachment.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list