About 5yr. log retention

Tom Vogt tom at ricardo.de
Fri Dec 8 07:18:32 PST 2000


Jim Choate wrote:
> > I didn't say they are veiled because they value privacy, did I? nope, I
> > didn't. stop reading into my words and start reading the words
> > themselves. thank you.
> 
> I didn't say you did. I DID say your statement was misleading because it
> only mentions privacy. That isn't the only issue with your example. As a
> result, it's a weak argument.
> 
> As usual, you pick an example, it has a couple of nit picks you skipped
> or thought unimportant, and you get all defensive when they're pointed
> out. Almost like you're still searching for Mr. Goodbar still...
> 
> Pick your examples more carefully and explain them a bit more carefully
> and you won't have this problem.

eh, where exactly is your problem? frankly, I don't care if people
without brains could get "mislead" or something I said has a hair in it
that you can split. maybe I should add a disclaimer to my mails: "some
intelligence required. parts not included"





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list