bill soper & brains
bill payne
billp at nmol.com
Wed Sep 16 05:40:18 PDT 1998
Wednesday 9/16/98 6:56 PM
Underwood
More than 40 years ago Armand [bunky] Larive, I, and others took
history of philosphy from bill soper.
Laivre is an an episcopal priest in Pullman now.
http://www.web-x.com/wazzu.net/restaurantguide/index.html
I don't see sopher listed in the faculty directory.
http://people.whitman.edu/faculty_homepages.html
Sopher invited an attractive articulate lady from the B'Hai religion
to lecture our class.
The LADY put forth an argument on why we should all believe.
In the next lecture Soper, as a philospher should, went into
every detail why her arguments were falacious.
The contemplation of things as they are,
without error or confusion,
without substitution or imposture,
is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention.
Francis Bacon
I think Lairve was present at the lecture and analysis.
I PROFITED FROM YOUR differential equations AND
elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint courses.
But this has been about 40 years ago.
I still have the books used in your classes.
And my education at Whitman.
Then, too, I profited from Zirakzaheh's higher alegraba course in the
summer of 1958 at U Colorado.
Let's hope this gets settled before someone gets NUKED.
We know these guys. http://www.wpiran.org/ http://www.taliban.com/
http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/impact/namir/namirm.html
And we SPECULATE that they are NOT HAPPY ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED.
bill
----
Subject:
Politicians, lawyers, and crypto
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 1998 16:50:15 -0600
From:
bill payne <billp at nmol.com>
To:
john_ashcroft at ashcroft.senate.gov
Subject:
Politicians, lawyers, and crypto
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 1998 16:48:32 -0600
From:
bill payne <billp at nmol.com>
To:
senator_leahy at leahy.senate.gov, conrad_burns at burns.senate.gov
Subject:
Politicians, lawyers, and crypto
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 1998 16:46:11 -0600
From:
bill payne <billp at nmol.com>
To:
john_kerry at kerry.senate.gov
Subject:
Politicians, lawyers, and crypto
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 1998 16:44:26 -0600
From:
bill payne <billp at nmol.com>
To:
info at kyl.senate.gov
CC:
senator_mccain at mccain.senate.gov, grassley
<chuck_grassley at grassley.senate.gov>, cynthia mckinney
<CYMCK at mail.house.gov>
Kyl
I am reading http://www.cdt.org/crypto/jonkyl.html
Please help get this MESS settled.
bill
----
Subject:
crypto nonsense
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 1998 16:38:25 -0600
From:
bill payne <billp at nmol.com>
To:
abd at cdt.org, info at cdt.org, webmaster at cdt.org
CHRYSLER AWARD NOMINATION STATEMENT
9/16/9812:50 PM
American forefathers drafted the Constitution and laws of our country
shortly after having suffered injustice.
Fresh in their minds were strategies used by their oppressors. Writers
of the Constitution and laws anticipated
ways to subvert our system. Therefore, our forefathers designed
safeguards into our legal system to prevent
future injustice.
But these safeguards DONT appear to be working today.
Morales and Payne designed a strategy using the National Security Agency
[NSA], Sandia National
Laboratories, the US Federal Court System, and publication on Internet
to illustrate how the US government
has deteriorated.
Arthur Morales WAS a supervisor at Sandia Labs in 1991. Morales and
Manuel Garcia organized a class
action lawsuit on behalf of Hispanics against Sandia.
Sandia settled Morales and Garcias lawsuit. Department of Energy
acknowledged from Freedom of
Information Act [FOIA] requests that as of December 31, 1995 Morales
cost Sandia $567,137 in legal fees.
Sandia retaliated against Morales. Morales sued Sandia in New Mexico
District Court. Morales lost.
William Payne wrote a technical report describing deficiencies in
NSAs cryptographic algorithms
http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm. Sandia transferred Payne to break
electronics locks for the Federal Bureau of
Invesitgation [FBI]. Payne refused to do illegal work.
http://www.jya.com/whp1.htm.
Payne sued Sandia in Federal Court. Payne lost and court records were
sealed.
FBI agent Bernardo Perez led a class action lawsuit against the FBI for
race discrimination against Hispanic
FBI agents. http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/1995/w951482w.txt
Perez won. Perez was assigned agent-in-charge of the FBI in Albuquerque
for settlement. But Perez lost
money.
Morales and Payne learned that the FBI extorted an inexpensive
settlement from Perez by telling Perez that the FBI was GUARANTEED to
win on appeal in Federal Circuit.
With Perez and others knowledge of circuit courts, Morales and Payne
appealed their respective cases pro se
to the Tenth Circuit.
In Paynes case Sandia failed to submit its Brief of the Appellees on
time. Then falsified its certificate of
service when Payne filed to remand.
In Morales case Sandia submitted a deficient Brief of the Appellees
which was returned but failed to serve
Morales with its brief.
Payne and Morales both won at the Tenth Circuit on technicalities. But
judges awarded the wins to Sandia.
All attempts by Morales and Payne to get copies of the docket for their
respective Tenth Circuit cases failed.
Therefore, Morales and Payne hatched a plan to get the dockets and
expose government misconduct.
Payne previously made FOIA requests to NSA for copies of messages and
translations given to
Iraq during the Iraq/Iran war, copies of Libyan messages intercepted by
NSA, and NSA cryptographic
algorithms Payne thought contained deficiencies.
Morales and Payne sued NSA pro se for the documents. Lawsuit progress
was broadcast on Internet through e-
mail and
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm
http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm
And Payne wrote
Black and White Test of Cryptographic Algorithms
criticizing the US governments crypto contest. http://zolatimes.com.
Morales and Payne FINALLY got copies of dockets from their respective
cases from the Tenth
Circuit using Internet as an innovative tool.
/\/\/\/\/\/\
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 11:08:39 -0700
From: The Electronic Zola <ezola at lfcity.com>
To: biru
Subject: Re: Interested LATER?
Hi Biru,
> In
>
> Non-random Cryptographic Keys Defeat Key Escrow
>
> I will introduce, by example, readers to deBruijn diagrams and
> statistical tests.
> Both will be related to random number and pseudorandom number
> generation.
Sounds good to us.
We know mathematics scares our readers. But some of our
editors like it just fine. And we don't care much for
the Great Satan around here.
Cheers,
Z
---
I am not reading e-mail.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list