Limit on number of primes....a (stupid) idiot...
Anonymous
nobody at replay.com
Tue Nov 24 16:37:45 PST 1998
Jim Choate is so stupid that even when he accidentally gets something
right, he quickly "corrects" himself so that he is wrong again:
> I had typed x/ln(x) as the asymptotic limit for the number of primes less
> than x.
>
> This is incorrect. It should be,
>
> x/log(x)
Wrong, doofus. x/ln(x) is the correct asymptotic limit. What role could
logs to the base 10 possibly play? Do you think God favors the number 10?
What a fool you are!
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list