throw away accounts? (was Re: Remailer Attack)

[Adam Back]

Tim May <tcmay at got.net> writes:
> As to what is needed to generally improve the remailers, this has been
> discussed many times. Cf. my Cyphernomicon for some thoughts, c. 1994,
> which actually haven't changed much.
> 
> Generally, a bunch of things would be nice to have:
> 
> * throwaway accounts, and yet with some robustness or reputation capital
> backing them

We've kind of got throw away accounts recently, Ian Goldberg wrote a
perl script to open accounts and sendmail through a couple of the free
web based email services.

On the remailer operators list use of this script was discussed as an
alternative for remailer operators moving to `middleman' operation, or
closing down entirely in the face of threats.

There might even be a remailer or two using this ... perhaps some
remailer operators could fill us in.

Adam
-- 
Now officially an EAR violation...
Have *you* violated EAR today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/

print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`